Useful contact numbers added to Members area...
Did anyone read the full article?
Quote from: Belker on October 29, 2019, 03:06:26 pmQuote from: Rat Catcher on October 29, 2019, 01:47:55 pmI'd say the 250 is based on assumptions that would be unlikely to be ascertainable beyond reasonable doubt.I'm not too sure about that, if'n the forces that be had a receipt roll long enough to print off all his transactions from his meter and see how many of the 250 were done on tariff 3 ??Exactly they went through his meter
Quote from: Rat Catcher on October 29, 2019, 01:47:55 pmI'd say the 250 is based on assumptions that would be unlikely to be ascertainable beyond reasonable doubt.I'm not too sure about that, if'n the forces that be had a receipt roll long enough to print off all his transactions from his meter and see how many of the 250 were done on tariff 3 ??
I'd say the 250 is based on assumptions that would be unlikely to be ascertainable beyond reasonable doubt.
The meter data can only confirm that the meter recorded the fares incorrectly which is probably a single fixed penalty offence attracting a c.€40 fine. It can't prove what each client paid, witnesses would be required for that.
Inference isn't proof. More likely that he'll agree to plead guilty to a sample charge or two.