Author Topic: UBER  (Read 23327 times)

The Liffey Lip

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #30 on: December 11, 2017, 11:26:00 am »
If a lot more people here were more careful and used the word "if" more frequently...there "would" be several more contributors posting....Scriptio Continua.

john m

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #31 on: December 11, 2017, 11:31:44 am »
I wonder why Mytaxi were funding the course for people to get a psv driving licence when they dont have taxies .IF it turns out to be a fudge our  future might not be great IF its a fudge ,

The Liffey Lip

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #32 on: December 11, 2017, 11:39:34 am »
Leading Lemmings closer to the precipice...but they refuse to see it as the cliff isn't directly in front of them.......yet.

Offline mercenary for hire

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12415
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: UBER
« Reply #33 on: December 11, 2017, 11:41:07 am »
Just spell it out lads.

Offline Taxi driver42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3886
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: UBER
« Reply #34 on: December 11, 2017, 02:44:19 pm »
Did  the prejudgment not say  transport so ok

john m

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #35 on: December 11, 2017, 03:41:44 pm »
Did  the prejudgment not say  transport so ok

The pre judgement said they were a transport company but that was before there was an opportunity to collect up some brown envelopes .only took 8 months to type up the final judgement ,Lets hope they are adjudged to be a transport company as the Rodent opined most drivers in the UK  are minicab drivers not freelancers .

Offline Rat Catcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26799
  • Karma: +34/-65535
  • Part Time Amateur Scum
Re: UBER
« Reply #36 on: December 11, 2017, 03:44:10 pm »
All are freelance minicab drivers in London. AFAIK, the rest of the UK is the same. I'm not aware of UberPop operating anywhere on the British Isles.
If it doesn't have a roof sign and door stickers it's not a taxi.

Offline Taxi driver42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3886
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: UBER
« Reply #37 on: December 11, 2017, 03:46:55 pm »
Did  the prejudgment not say  transport so ok

The pre judgement said they were a transport company but that was before there was an opportunity to collect up some brown envelopes .only took 8 months to type up the final judgement ,Lets hope they are adjudged to be a transport company as the Rodent opined most drivers in the UK  are minicab drivers not freelancers .


So why u pay ken them

john m

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #38 on: December 11, 2017, 04:20:23 pm »
Did  the prejudgment not say  transport so ok

The pre judgement said they were a transport company but that was before there was an opportunity to collect up some brown envelopes .only took 8 months to type up the final judgement ,Lets hope they are adjudged to be a transport company as the Rodent opined most drivers in the UK  are minicab drivers not freelancers .


So why u pay ken them

  The prejudgement said they are a transport company I dont think that will change we will know for certain next Wednesday .If they are adjudged to be a tec company then we are all fucked .

Offline Dr. Martin Gooter Bling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4593
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: UBER
« Reply #39 on: December 12, 2017, 02:54:05 am »
absolutely appalling.
the equivalent of paying €180 from College Green to malahide.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-42311505

Offline markmiwurdz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4331
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: UBER
« Reply #40 on: December 12, 2017, 10:06:22 am »
"dynamic pricing"   rofl rofl

Offline Rat Catcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26799
  • Karma: +34/-65535
  • Part Time Amateur Scum
Re: UBER
« Reply #41 on: December 12, 2017, 11:39:01 am »
Malahide to College Green in snow. I don't know about Birmingham but that's a day's work in Dublin... and a fukking doctor who has no problem taking 60 notes for writing a couple of words on a prescription would happily give a hackney/limousine driver €30.
If it doesn't have a roof sign and door stickers it's not a taxi.

john m

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #42 on: December 12, 2017, 02:37:36 pm »
IF they were allowed to operate in this Village with unlicenced cars Im sure the taxithingey would insist on the fare card being the legal maximum fare but then again Limos can charge what they like. Anyhoo IF they become legal I might take up smuggling over the invisible border ,back in the day before Lidil and Aldi you could go up to the north fill your truck with cheap crap bring it down and sell it. A lucrative trade was had by going into the big distributors of magazines and newspapers and buying up all the out of date porno mags for 20p each and flogging them down here to specialist shops for £2 a copy .

Offline Rat Catcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26799
  • Karma: +34/-65535
  • Part Time Amateur Scum
Re: UBER
« Reply #43 on: December 12, 2017, 02:42:14 pm »
Why would unlicensed operators be subject to fare restrictions that don't apply to licensed operators?
If it doesn't have a roof sign and door stickers it's not a taxi.

john m

  • Guest
Re: UBER
« Reply #44 on: December 12, 2017, 03:19:38 pm »
Why would unlicensed operators be subject to fare restrictions that don't apply to licensed operators?

  Dynamic pricing ?I suppose IF they are allowed as you say the fare card only applies to taxies anyhoo The ECJ has signaled they are a transport company and lets hope they stick to that in the Full Judgement due out next Wednesday .
« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 03:28:00 pm by john m »

 


Show Unread Posts